Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.14UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.14UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.6LIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.7LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.19UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.83LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.58LIKELY
Extraversion
0.22UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.79LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.69LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Genesis 16:1-16
People make bad choices; but when we trust God’s promises we find the path to freedom.
Scene 1/ People make poor choices!
Is a common phrase; a phrase which is used a lot in educational settings.
I have heard it used in schools, in courts and in government departments.
Jeremy Clarkson from Top Gear made a poor choice when he hit the producer who did not provide a hot meal.
John made a poor choice when he used government funds to pay for his new yatch.
James made a poor choice when he pushed Jenny off the swing.
“People Make Poor Choices” is a politically correct term.
If you say James did the wrong thing when he pushed Jenny off the swing you are implying that James might be bad.
If you say that John embezzled funds from his employer you are implying that John is a thief.
If you say that Jeremy punched the producer you are implying that Jeremy has a violent temper
When you say someone made a poor choice you are seen as being non judgemental.
But in reality you are avoiding the fundamental question which determines every action a person makes.
Wether conscious or unconscious every action and inaction is a result of character.
I have noticed that a lot of organisations have what is called mandatory training; it is especially prevalent in government and industry.
In essence someone tells a group of people the things that they should not do.
They usually address this from the perspective of disciplinary consequence, health effects, reputation and the organisation’s stated values.
The idea is that if you tell people that they are not to do something and then spell out the negative consequences for them if they do, then they won’t do them.
The problem is it doesn’t work.
It doesn’t work because it fails to address the issue of character.
If character is not well developed and based upon a sound moral and ethical framework then people will not automatically do the right thing; some will intentionally do the wrong thing.
Scene 2/ Sarah made bad choices
Originally known as Sarai this woman was the wife of Abram.
In Genesis 16:1-2 we read about a time when Sarai found it difficult to trust God and sought to apply a cultural solution to her problem rather than relying on God’s promise.
Sarai was the wife of a powerful patriarch by the name of Abram.
Later on she would be known as Sarah and her husband as Abraham.
These people were semi nomadic.
And Abraham was very wealthy.
God had promised Abraham, wealth and descendents and land.
But he didn’t have any children.
In those times if a couple didn’t have any children it was assumed that the problem was with the wife.
For a woman to be barren was a great burden, not only did she have to deal with the emotional pain of not being able to conceive she also had to deal with the cultural shame.
The Patriarch of a clan was the absolute ruler of his household and in Abraham’s case we are told in Genesis 14:14 that he had 318 trained men born in his household.
So by the time you add in women and children you are looking at a clan group of over a thousand people.
And everything belonged to Abraham and he needed an heir or in accordance with the rules of the day it would all go to the most senior servant.
So Sarah was feeling the pressure, God had promised a son and she was not able to produce one.
In her time this was an especially great burden.
So instead of trusting the promise God had given, Sarai decided to apply a culturally accepted solution to her problem.
If a woman had a servant and gave that servant to her husband then she could claim the child as her own.
The idea being that if the husband was hers and the slave was hers then any resulting child was hers.
But her solution didn’t deliver what she wanted.
In Genesis 16:4-5a we read that the slave Hagar became pregnant and knew that she was now in a position of power.
She will bear a child, possibly a son.
This will be cause to win the affections of the Patriarch Abraham.
In essence we are seeing a contest for the top position.
Sarah’s response is also predictable.
In Genesis 16:5 we see bitterness.
Her plan has not worked out; it is blowing up in her face.
So she blames her husband (16:5b).
Scene 3/ Abraham made bad choices
Abraham had been given a promise.
Abraham failed to trust God.
Rather than seeing the reality that the actions of his wife were a failure to trust God, he willingly accepted the solution she offered.
Genesis 16:2b-4a doesn’t record Abraham offering any resistance to the idea of having the slave Hagar.
She was certainly much younger than Sarah who was now quite old.
So Abraham accepts the offer.
Now you would think that after clearly receiving a promise from God that he would have a son of his own Abraham would check with God before he did anything about that promise.
But he didn’t, he just went ahead and took Hagar into his tent.
God had given a promise, but Abraham and Sarah decided to take things into their own hands.
They came up with a solution which was acceptable in their culture, but it was a solution which would bring untold suffering, a solution which did not trust God.
Have a look at Genesis 16:6b-12
Hagar ran away.
On her journey back towards her homeland of Egypt the angel of the Lord found her.
Now whenever the angel of the Lord turns up, we need to understand that this is a way of referring to a theophany, a physical manifestation of God.
And in the Old Testament his appearances are associated with dramatic announcements and times of great distress.
But his announcement, while of comfort to Hagar was not such good news for a peaceful future.
Hagar would have a son and name him Ishmael; he would have more descendents than you can count.
But ---- he would be forever in conflict with his relatives and with everyone.
Ishmael is the father of the Arab peoples and to this day his descendents are a people in conflict with each other.
Ishmael’s descendents are also in conflict with their relatives, the Jews, the people who would descend from Ishmael’s half brother Isaac who would later be born to Abraham & Sarah.
Abraham failed to trust God’s promise and he failed to stand up & defend the weak (16:6)
Genesis 16:6 tells us that Abraham simply let Sarah do whatever she wanted to Hagar.
Hagar was largely an innocent victim of the failures of her masters Sarah & Abraham.
Abraham had a duty to protect her and he didn’t.
He allowed Sarah to mistreat her and drive her away.
Hagar was carrying his child and he didn’t intervene.
Abraham failed miserably on all accounts and Genesis 16 is in many ways a parallel account of Genesis 3.
Just as in the garden of Eden, Adam & Eve fell so did Abraham & Sarah.
Eve doubted God’s word and took the forbidden fruit and offered it to her husband.
Sarah doubted God’s promise and took Hagar and offered her to her husband.
Adam didn’t object to his wife’s offer and took the fruit.
Abraham didn’t object to his wife’s offer and took Hagar.
Adam blamed Eve
Sarah blamed Abraham
And in both cases untold suffering has been the result.
But even in the midst of this God is still concerned for the oppressed woman Hagar and offers her the comfort of knowing her child will have many descendents.
And Abraham proves the point that throughout Scripture the idea of having more than one woman is never a good idea.
One woman is truly more than enough trouble for any man
Scene 4/ It is hard for us to trust God’s promises, especially when they are counter cultural; but trusting in God’s promises is the path to freedom.
God promises to bless us, but we take things into our hands.
Instead of being wise and balanced in our work we over commit and try to fit in more than we should in order to get a head.
We swallow the cultural lie that we can make it on our own.
Instead of taking the time to be wise, to look for God’s hand in everything we do, we rush ahead.
The result, tiredness and stress and worry.
God promises to love us and to give us complete fulfilment in relationship with him.
But we swallow the lie that fulfilment is found is having lots of nice stuff.
Our homes, our cars, our boats, our hobbies, our business become out idols.
And we are never satisfied.
We seek self worth from the praise of family, friends, and colleagues.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9