Perfected In Unity
Introduction
UNITY: vv. 21-23
“in order that” = purpose
“all ones might be/become one/unified/solidarity” = present active subj.
“You, Father, are in Me and I in You...”
The only possible way to have unity among believers is for all of them to find unity first with God in Christ
There is no suggestion of a unity of organisation, such as that which appears in Paul’s conception of the Church as one body with many members, each performing its appropriate function (Rom. 12:4f., 1 Cor. 12:12f.). No biological analogy is offered here to assist us in comprehending the sense in which Christians are intended to be one. Jesus had said already that His sheep would ultimately be One Flock, even as they had One Shepherd (10:16). But the mystical phrases used in this passage transcend even that thought. For He prays that the unity of His disciples may be realised in the spiritual life, after the pattern of that highest form of unity, in which the Father is “in” the Son and the Son “in” the Father. This unity, however, as appertaining to Christian discipleship, is not invisible; it is to be such as will convince the world of the Divine mission of the common Master of Christians. And He has already explained that the badge of this unity is love, the love of Christian for Christian which all men may see (13:35).
It has been customary, following the habit of the patristic commentators, to interpret these significant words in the light of the controversies of the fourth century. Bengel, e.g. (following Augustine), says: “Per sumus refutatur Sabellius, per unum Arius”; the words thus being taken to prove identity of essence between the Father and the Son, while the difference of persons is indicated by the plural ἐσμέν. But it is an anachronism to transfer the controversies of the fourth century to the theological statements of the first. We have a parallel to ἕν ἐσμεν in 1 Cor. 3:8, where Paul says ὁ φυτεύων καὶ ὁ ποτίζων ἕν εἰσιν, meaning that both the “planter” and the “waterer” of the seed are in the same category, as compared with God who gives the increase. A unity of fellowship, of will, and of purpose between the Father and the Son is a frequent theme in the Fourth Gospel (cf. 5:18, 19, 14:9, 23 and 17:11, 22), and it is tersely and powerfully expressed here; but to press the words so as to make them indicate identity of οὐσία, is to introduce thoughts which were not present to the theologians of the first century.
ἕν εἰσιν. Are in one category, as fellow-workers; consequently it is monstrous to set them against one another as rivals. As contrasted with God, they are all of one value, just nothing. But that does not mean that each, when compared with the other, is exactly equal in His sight. The other side of the truth is introduced with δέ.
“…that the world may believe that You sent Me...”
“The glory which You have given Me…”
PRESENCE: V.24
“be with Me where I am...”
LOVE: VV. 25-26
“I have made Your name known to them...”
“…and will make it known...”
“…so that the love with which You loved Me may be in them, and I in them...”
The “inter-indwelling” of the Father and Son would serve as the pattern of the “inter-dwelling” of Jesus and his followers. Such reciprocal indwelling does not mean that both sets of the parties are fully equal, but the latter statement must be understood to be a picture of the closest possible relationship between Jesus and his followers without any hint of equality