How To Keep the Church Holy (Part 3)
Formal public discipline works best in a church culture where informal and private discipline is welcomed and practiced.
Public accountability should be an outgrowth of what’s already going on in the private lives of church members.
Formal church discipline works best when members already know how to give and receive loving correction. They do it in their homes. They do it over lunch. They do it gently, carefully, and always with the good of the other person in mind.
Formal church discipline is the appropriate course of action whenever a church member’s failure to represent Jesus becomes so characteristic and habitual that the church no longer believes he or she is a Christian
Ultimately, I believe the combination of Matthew 18 and 1 Corinthians 5 suggests that churches need to arrive at one of three conclusions before determining that it’s time to act:
• When a church becomes convinced that a person is genuinely repentant, it should not proceed with any form of discipline (and I cannot think of a single exception to this principle).
• When a church becomes convinced that a person is characteristically (not temporarily) unrepentant, it should proceed with excommunication.
• When a sin is so deliberate, repugnant, and indicative of a deep double-mindedness that a congregation is left unable to give credence to a profession of repentance, at least until time has passed and trust has been re-earned, it should proceed with excommunication, determining to test for repentance after the fact.
The question of “how long” is not difficult for theoretical reasons; it’s difficult for real-life reasons. We cannot see into people’s hearts, and we feel the burden of being tremendously careful whenever we are called upon to inspect the fruit and make a determination on a matter as important as whether the church can continue testifying that someone belongs to the kingdom of God.
Humans can sometimes fool themselves into believing that they can have both Jesus and their favorite sin. It takes several rounds of escalating confrontations to help them realize, “No, I cannot. It’s one or the other.”
The basic counsel the elders of my own church give is that the general tenor of one’s relationships with the disciplined individual should markedly change. Interactions should not be characterized by casualness but by deliberate conversations about repentance. Certainly family members should continue to fulfill family obligations (see Eph. 6:1–3; 1 Tim. 5:8; 1 Pet. 3:1–2).