Sermon Tone Analysis

Diversity and Inclusion

Our culture has recently recognised two powerful values which improve people’s lives when they are promoted at work and elsewhere.

You’ve probably heard about these values, you may even have been trained in them.

They are: inclusion and diversity.

Let me quote from globaldiversitypractices.com, first on diversity:

“Diversity is any dimension that can be used to differentiate groups and people from one another.

“In a nutshell, it’s about empowering people by respecting and appreciating what makes them different, in terms of age, gender, ethnicity, religion, disability, sexual orientation, education, and national origin.

“Diversity allows for the exploration of these differences in a safe, positive, and nurturing environment.

It means understanding one another by surpassing simple tolerance to ensure people truly value their differences.

This allows us both to embrace and also to celebrate the rich dimensions of diversity contained within each individual and place positive value on diversity in the community and in the workforce.”

That generally sounds good, right?

There are a couple of things that Christians might find questionable, such as the idea that respecting and appreciating someone’s religion or sexual orientation is going to empower them in some helpful way.

Let’s put that to the side for the moment, though.

What about inclusion?

globaldiversitypractices.com says:

“Inclusion is an organisational effort and practices in which different groups or individuals having different backgrounds are culturally and socially accepted and welcomed.

“These differences could be self-evident, such as national origin, age, race and ethnicity, religion/belief, gender, marital status and socioeconomic status or they could be more inherent, such as educational background, training, sector experience, organisational tenure, even personality, such as introverts and extroverts.

“Inclusive cultures make people feel respected and valued for who they are as an individual or group.

People feel a level of supportive energy and commitment from others so that they can do their best at work.

Inclusion often means a shift in an organisation’s mind-set and culture that has visible effects, such as participation in meetings, how offices are physically organised or access to particular facilities or information.

“The process of inclusion engages each individual and makes people feel valued as being essential to the success of the organisation.

Evidence shows that when people feel valued, they function at full capacity and feel part of the organisation’s mission.

This culture shift creates higher performing organizations where motivation and morale soar.”

This particular definition seems quite reasonable, right?

You and I might baulk a little at that final sentence which makes it all seem so focused on efficiency and utility (which it is—our society’s values are strongly influence by business).

The Christian perspective

You’re probably wondering where on earth I’m going with this.

What does this have to do with evangelism, or even the church?

It actually has a lot to do with the church.

Like most Western values, these new values of inclusion and diversity are derived from Christianity.

Indeed, it is these two values that have driven the global expansion of Jesus’ body—the church.

Jesus expressed the value of inclusion constantly.

For example, just before the last supper in John’s account of Jesus’ ministry, we find him expressing this:

The first part of this verse might sound strange to Christian ears, but the second part is very familiar.

Jesus came into the world to save people, not to judge them.

We’ll come back to this verse and its context in a moment, but let’s move on.

Jesus final commission for his disciples was also a clearly inclusive command:

There is no exclusion here, no peoples or individuals that the disciples are banned from inviting into the kingdom.

And we see in this command, an openness to diversity.

Jesus uses the Greek term ethne, translated “all the nations.”

This is the Greek root of our word “ethnicity,” and it has a very similar meaning to that word.

In the Jewish use of the New Testament, the word often refers to the Gentiles, in other words, to all other ethnicities than the Jews.

The church is built on a radically cross-cultural diversity.

That diversity is enduring, it will be present at the end of time.

In John’s revelation, his vision of the final entry of the church into their place of rest, the New Jerusalem, says,

In this beautiful vision, we see the inclusion and diversity inherent in Christianity.

All the nations will enter into the kingdom.

Finally, Christianity has perhaps the most powerful appeal for diversity in all of history.

It is made by the apostle Paul in his letter to that very diverse city of Corinth:

Paul’s argument in this passage is that the body of Christ, the church, is like a human body in being made of many different parts.

The difference between the parts is intentional and necessary, he says, and is designed-in by God.

This wonderful image of diversity in unity has served the church well, and has been of great use in our society, too.

But this image really emphasises the difference between the Christian conception of inclusiveness and diversity and our society’s version.

So let’s address that now—it’s a crucial difference.

Christian inclusion and diversity

The Christian ideas of inclusion and diversity differs from our society’s in three ways:

The Christian idea of being included envisions a much greater sort of inclusion than our society’s

The Christian idea of inclusion requires more than mere participation or presence from people

The Christian idea of diversity values people for who they are, not for what their differences may contribute.

Remember how that definition I read of inclusion talked about respecting and embracing people’s difference?

You might have wondered why it only used words like respect, appreciate, value, embrace and celebrate.

It doesn’t mention caring or loving or serving or even “doing life together” or being friends.

Contrast that with Paul, who sees inclusion interacting with diversity in this way:

Note the language here, caring, suffering for and with one another, serving, giving honour to, protecting, etc.

How different is that?

Christian inclusion, you see, is inclusion in a family.

John explained right at the beginning of his gospel:

And this simple sentence reveals that extra requirement of Christian inclusion over and above mere participation: the need to believe and accept Jesus.

Remember, our society’s idea of inclusion and diversity is that people can simply come together with an attitude of celebrating each other and everything will be wonderful.

Tragically, this doesn’t work.

It is a utopian view of reality.

“Utopia” was the name of an island in Sir Thomas More’s satirical novel of that name, and he constructed the name from the Greek words for “not” and “place,” indicating that his idealistic island did not (and could not) exist.

The same is true of our society’s utopian idea of inclusion and diversity without personal cost.

It doesn’t exist.

It can’t.

The reason is simple: our society’s idea of diversity places no limits on the type of diversity, and that diversity is driven by personal desire.

When you put two or more human beings together (inclusion) and encourage them to go their own way (diversity),

conflict becomes increasingly likely.

With no greater good to moderate our differences, we have no way to resolve those differences.

Simply forcing people together with the mantra that they must accept one another doesn’t work, it just makes conflict more likely.

That is why no prior cultures have ever expressed these two values together—humanity has no way to resolve the conflicts they cause.

Here’s an example of why it doesn’t work.

This is a news report from Tasmania earlier this month:

“Lesbian activist Jessica Hoyle alleges she was ordered to leave the Launceston Target store by a non-binary staff member who called her a “TERF”, a term for feminists who exclude trans­gender women.

In a complaint lodged with Equal Opportunity Tasmania, Miss Hoyle said at the time of the incident she was wearing clothing featuring the logo of Lesbian Gay Bisexual Tasmania, which does not advocate for transgender ­people.

According to Miss Hoyle and witnesses, she was talking to two other shoppers about “the need for female-only lesbian events” and female, rather than gender-neutral, toilets.”

We see here two people who most in our society would consider to be perfectly comfortable with inclusion, since they both belong to the popular group of LGBTQ+ people.

But in reality, the desires of Ms Hoyle seem to be at odds with the non-binary Target staff member.

One wants biological women to be recognised as women, and treated as distinctive, different from biological men.

The other, based on their actions, wants this distinction broken down at any cost.

These two desires are in direct conflict, and no amount of “embracing” or “valuing” each other is going to change this.

Our society has these values of diversity and inclusion because it inherited them from Christianity, which did make them work together.

But our society has abandoned the crucial step which allowed these two values to work together, and is well on the way to discovering how foolish that was.

Making diversity and inclusion possible

Which brings us, finally, to that crucial step that makes the inclusivity and diversity of Christianity possible.

A few moments ago I quoted John’s expression of that step as “believing and accepting Jesus.”

Perhaps the most powerful way the Bible talks about it is using the term “repentance.”

In his second sermon, after healing the beggar at the Golden Gate, Peter gives a succinct explanation of how Christian inclusion works:

Repentance is the act of “turning back” to God, from whom we have previously turned away in rebellion.

All people are rebels against God, and so are mired in sin—the attitude of self-centred arrogance.