Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.68LIKELY
Disgust
0.19UNLIKELY
Fear
0.06UNLIKELY
Joy
0.06UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.29UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.46UNLIKELY
Confident
0.63LIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.87LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.68LIKELY
Extraversion
0.2UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.41UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.71LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Things to be abolished in the kingdom of God
War and destruction
Illness and suffering
Sin
God speaks here of his abolition of sinful, human hard-heartedness
Death and mourning
The abolition of idolatry in Israel
Israel was commanded to abolish Canaanite worship
The abolition of mediums and spiritists
In Asa’s reign
In Hezekiah’s reign
In Josiah’s reign
The abolition of the temple
Sacrifice in the temple abolished
Antiochus Epiphanes abolished the daily sacrifice in the temple in 168 b.c., thereby attacking the symbolic centre of Israel’s life.
Jesus Christ was accused of seeking to abolish the temple
Jesus Christ’s action may have been understood as a symbolic abolition of a defiled sacrificial system;
The final abolition of the temple in the new Jerusalem
Abolition and the law
The law has not been abolished
The law has been abolished as an instrument of condemnation
The law does not abolish God’s promises
God did not abolish his promise of righteousness to Abraham when he gave the law, because the promise was not conditional upon keeping the law but is received by faith.
The offence of the cross is abolished by accepting circumcision
Jews found offensive the Christians’ claim that salvation did not come through keeping the law, but instead through faith in a crucified Messiah, whom the law had cursed.
Paul regarded “the offence of the cross” as central to the gospel, and refused to make salvation conditional upon circumcision and obedience to the law.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9