Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.07UNLIKELY
Fear
0.07UNLIKELY
Joy
0.53LIKELY
Sadness
0.51LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.54LIKELY
Confident
0.44UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.95LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.61LIKELY
Extraversion
0.18UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.7LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.67LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Accepting the truth about the cross
Peter as an instrument to Satan
Excerpt From: A. W. Tozer & Ravi Zacharias.
“The Radical Cross.”
Apple Books.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/the-radical-cross/id986613418?mt=11
Excerpt From: A. W. Tozer & Ravi Zacharias.
“The Radical Cross.”
Apple Books.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/the-radical-cross/id986613418?mt=11
“All this it did and continued to do as long as it was permitted to remain what it had been originally—a cross.
Its power departed when it was changed from a thing of death to a thing of beauty.
When men made of it a symbol, hung it around their necks as an ornament or made its outline before their faces as a magic sign to ward off evil, then it became at best a weak emblem, at worst a positive fetish.
As such it is revered today by millions who know absolutely nothing about its power.”
Excerpt From: A. W. Tozer & Ravi Zacharias.
“The Radical Cross.”
Apple Books.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/the-radical-cross/id986613418?mt=11
Excerpt From: A. W. Tozer & Ravi Zacharias.
“The Radical Cross.”
Apple Books.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/the-radical-cross/id986613418?mt=11
that it was determined for Jesus Christ to die on the cross
Excerpt From: A. W. Tozer & Ravi Zacharias.
“The Radical Cross.”
Apple Books.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/the-radical-cross/id986613418?mt=11
It was the purpose for Jesus Christ coming to earth
Luke 9:55-
John 12:
The revelation revealed in verse 21 was preceded by Peter’s confession on who Jesus is
From that time
From that time - Jesus always walked according to the time table of His Father and His sovereign will
Jesus’ life was governed by the sovereign will of the Father
The timing of His birth
The timing of His ministry
Matthew
The timing of His death
Matthew
Luke 22:
John 12:
Jesus walked in the sovereign will of the Father
Jesus began to show to His disciples - Jesus is preparing His disciples for the certainity of the cross.
No turning back
Jesus begins speaking clearly about the cross
His ministry was based upon the Father’s plan
Before this time Jesus’ death was referred to but not as plainly
Was Jesus calling Peter Satan or was Jesus speaking directly to Satan?
Either way Peter was being used as an instrument and representative of Satan
The Old Testament gave shadows or hints of the cross
The promise in the garden
The Old Testament
It was a tree that expelled the man and woman from paradise.
It would be a tree that would open up the way back into paradise
Abraham and Isaac some believe the spot they traveled to is close to the spot of the crucifixion
The Passover Lamb
1 Corinthians 5:7
Simeon in the Temple
Luke 2:25-35
John the Baptist
Jesus Himself
John 2
John 2:19-
This follows Peter’s confession on who Jesus is
That He must go to Jerusalem - the city were He is to die
Jerusalem = foundation of peace (Hebrew)
It was fitting that most violent and unjust act of history should take place in and near the city of peace.
For it was through this act that peace with God was made possible the only secure and safe peace agreement ever made
Jesus had no options
Jesus willingly journey to Jerusalem
And suffer many things - Experiencing physical or emotional pain.
The prayer in the Garden, the arrest, the trials, and the crucifixion
From the elders, and chief priests and scribes, - Sanhedrin
This ruling body was the main group instrumental in bringing Jesus to trial and bringing accusation about Him before Rome
And be killed, - Jesus literally died
And be raised again the third day - Jesus literally rose from the dead.
His heart had stopped and His heart began to beat again
The cross is repulsive to the human mind
Then Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him, -
Peter failed many times due to depending upon his own flesh and mind
Luke 22:
Peter showed he had good theology previously but he still lacked spiritual understanding
Our response to the cross reveals in a small way God’s response to our sin
Saying, “Far be it from You, Lord; this shall not happen to You!” -
This shall not happen to You!” -
Possibly Peter’s love and loyalty for the Savior moved him to make this statement but his response showed he nor the others understood the plan of salvation
If Jesus established His kingdom as they wanted what would life be like?
Use Lazarus death as an illustration
Peter and the others were blinded to who or what was their greater enemy.
It wasn’t Rome or the Sanhedrin
1 Corinthians 15: 54-
All the disciples saw the coming Messiah and His kingdom through their own fallible interpretation of the Old Testament.They could never fully comprehend or understand His suffering until after the resurrection.
It didn’t make sense to them this would be the way Jesus Christ would establish His kingdom
The Interpretation of St. Matthew’s Gospel Chapter 16
To this day, all who fail to see the damning power of sin are blind to the true necessity of the cross.
They see in Christ crucified (since he was, indeed, crucified) nothing but a noble martyrdom, a sacrifice only in this sense and reject “the blood theology” of the gospel, the sacrifice which involves substitution, redemption by the blood of God’s Son, and the cleansing of the soul from guilt by faith in this sacrificial blood.
Thus they need no essential Son in their theology, and his resurrection may be regarded as a myth.
Like Peter, they would have a kingship without the Messianic priesthood.
But the very thing for which Peter started to rebuke Jesus afterward became the kernel, yea, the Alpha and the Omega, of his apostolic preaching.
The cross is resisted by Satan
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9