Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.09UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.13UNLIKELY
Joy
0.53LIKELY
Sadness
0.5LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0UNLIKELY
Confident
0.1UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.02UNLIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.13UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.13UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.62LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.06UNLIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
THUHMAI HRUAI (A)
sungah (A fiakmi sangka sungin lut uh, Sangka tum ih nan luh ah cun, a fehnak a ol, a sinan a netnak ah cun siatralnak an thleng ding a ti. a fate mi sangka in lut ih , a feh cu a har asinan nunnak pek theitu a si, curuagnah a fehtu khal an mal a ti.
Hmuh theinak (; ) A kaumi snagka cun siatralnak a pek a ti.
sungah (ramsa thuhla ka hmu thei ih, 16-20 tiang ah thingkung pawl kan hmu thei.
( sungah cun false prophet sungah kan hmu thei.
7:15 sung ah ralrin peknak a sim thok, (24:11, 24 ) sungah false prophet thawn ralrin a peknak thuhla kan hmu thei.
(Wolves - ; ).
Rah in nan thei ding (Prophet dik lo) - (7: 19, 3: 8, 10; 12: 33, 26, 21:19; ; )
7: 16b - Zirhtu diklo pawl khal Jesus thu zirhtu lak ah an tel ve ding “Bawipa, Bawipa tiah an ko ve ding a ti) (7: 21-22; 10:16; 24: 11-24)
7: 17-18 - Rah tha a rahmi le rah thalo a rahmi thuhla kan hmu thei.
()
7:19 - Rah tha a rah lomi cu Meisa sungah tlak an si ding ( - Speak of eschatological judgment (3: 8-10; 13:40-42, 50; 18: 8-9; 25:41) -
Good tree bear good fruit but nbadd fruit turn a way from God and His Kingdom, and live accrodingly Bad fruit.
7:20 ( For Matthew, “faith and works never part company” (Davies and Allison 1988:705).
For Matthew, “faith and works never part company” (Davies and Allison 1988:705).
7: 21 -23 - False Prophet cu an simmi in thuphan per an asi (; )
Turner, D., & Bock, D. L. (2005).
Cornerstone biblical commentary, Vol 11: Matthew and Mark (p. 116).
Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers.
Jesus in Pathian cu ka pa tiah ko ding in thu a pek.
(7:21) 6:9, 15; Sonship (3:17) (Eschatological judge ih thuhla a simmi a si.
THUHMAI HRUAI (B) THUTHENNAK NII
Cumi Nii ah : ( 10: 15; 11:22, 24: 19, 36, 38; Isiah 10:20)
Miin Bawipa Bawipa tiah in ko ding, Thiltam na hmin in kan tuah, Khuasia kan dawi, tvp.
(4:24; 8:3, 13, 16, 9:6, 22; 10:12:24-29) thuhla uainak cu (thilmak an tuahmi a hman lo mi hi a si).
Ka pa duhnak a tuahtu pawl lawng (6:10; 12: 50; 21: 28-32; 26:42) ------- (VAN CUNG UKNAK AN LUT DING)
(KA LO THEI DAH LO) Thei dah lo timi a hmang bet (25:12) … Prophet dik lo.
Thukam hlun khal ah a hmang, bulpak pehtlaih awknak (Hebres - YADA - 3045 - 3359) - (; Paslam 1: 6; ; ; ; ; Galati 4:9; )
KA HNEN IHSIN TLAN UH NAN NIH CU KA DAN THLUN LOTU NAN SI (Psal 6:8, 25: 41) - Culmi pawl cu (Daan nei lo ih a nung paw an si) - 24: 11; 13: 41; 23: 28; - Daan thlun daan ah an buai a si nan daan ih a tumtah mi cu (Thu awi nun hi a si)
Jesus cu daan famkim ter ding ah a ra.
(5:20) - Dunghtuntu pawl ih an kilkhawi bikmi cu Prophet dik lo hi an si.
7:24-27 () - This is the third kingdom response.
abang aw mi tong kam (ANUONE WHO) - 7:24 -26 )
KA THUPEKMI A NGAIIH A THLUN TU CU MIFIM AN SI, LLUNGPAR IH INN SAKTU PAWL VEK AN SI. (10: 16; 24:45; 25:2; 4,9).
--- Vancunguknak cu Inn saktu mifim le miaa pa vek in a ththim.
KA THUPEKMI A NGAIIH A THLUN TU CU MIFIM AN SI, LLUNGPAR IH INN SAKTU PAWL VEK AN SI. (10: 16; 24:45; 25:2; 4,9).
--- Vancunguknak cu Inn saktu mifim le miaa pa vek in a ththim.
KA THUPEKMI A THEI IH A THLUN LO TU CU (MI AA ) AN SI --- (5: 22; 23: 17; 25:2, 3, 8) - Inn sak tu pahnih ih thuhla kan hmuh thei cu cu (An tuahnak hi a si)
It is important to note that both the wise and foolish builders hear the teaching of Jesus.
It is his teaching, no longer that of Moses, that is the standard of judgment.
But it is not enough to have heard the teaching of Jesus.
Hearing and knowing the teaching of Jesus are worthwhile activities only when they result in application.
The false prophets, whatever their appearance and words, are lawless.
The wide gate, though attractive, leads to destruction.
Eschatological judgment utterly destroys houses built on sand, but houses built on rock withstand it.
(See 16:18 for the use of the building metaphor in a different context.)
eschatological judge.
A thupi zet mi: Mifim le miaa ih inn sak daan Jesuh ih a zirmi.
Moses ih a zirhmi thawna bang awnak a um, asinan a sang deuh ih (a standard cu - THUTHENNAK a si)…
Jesus ih a zirhmi ngai lawng si lo in, theihfiang hi a tul ih (Jesus in duhsak mi cu --- nunnak ih hman ding hi a si).
PROPHET DIKLO CU- AN KAA IN THU AN SIM IH AN NUNNAK AH DANGLAM IN AN NUNG.
(sungah, ziangvek ram le uknak a si timi cu “15-23” sungah fiangten kan hmu thei.
Jesus in nitin te in kan nunnak ah siatnralnak si lo in, duhhrilnak ka neihnak thu in sim.
Deu.
10: 19-20; ) - Nunnak hril uh cuti cun nan fate an nung ding ih Pathian kha thinlung tak in nan biak thei ding.
Pathian duhnak tuah thuhla a sim tik ah: Prophet, Zirh tu dik le dik lo tahthimnak khal ah - An nunnak in zoh uh a ti: (Deu 13: 1-11; 18: 20-22)
Tuahmi hman le tuahmi hman lo thu hla a sim ().
Nunnak hriluh a ti cumi cu (Duhhrilnak/ Thu then catnak thawn lutuh a ti).
- A fiakmi sangka in lut uh a ti ih, a hrilih a lut ih a nungtu cu mimalte an si ee a ti.
(Nunnak le Siat ralnak)
A fiakmi lamzin timi hi Jews pawl ih an zirh aw mi a si
: Zumtu hmaisa pawl ih an zirh aw mi a si ko.
Thukam Thar ih (Kawhhran pawl ziangmi si an zirh aw:
An nih cu Thukam thar ngan a si hrih lo ruang ah an hman mi Bible hi (O.T) Thukam hlun a si.
A fiakmi le a kaumi Lamzin (A fate mi le a tummi lamzin)
A fiakmi lamzin
A fiakmi lamzin: A fate ih “a thlun khal a haar) Cumi cu hril ding a si.
A kaumi lamzin cu a kau ih duhhrilnak a tul lo.
Easy and hard are not the best translations of eurychōros and tethlimmenē, which reinforce ‘wide’ and ‘narrow’
(Meisa)
eurychōros and tethlimmenē
(Pathain uknak sung ih luhnak)
(Cumi ni ah)
(Ka hnen ihsin tlan uh)
(cutnel par ih inn sak tu le lungpi par ih inn saktu)
Jesuh ih a simmi faignte in kan hmu thei:
Greek:
(A) Eurychoros (Wide - Easy)
A) Eurychoros (Wide - Easy)
(B) Ththlimmene (Narrow - Hard)
: Himi sung kan zoh tikah Matt.
5nak ihsin a fate vivo ih ah cun “Sangka te le tum a sim” naklam ah tla cu “Bawipa ih ti din gkeicun ka lo thei lo ka lo ti ding”a ti.
Vancung ram luhnak sangka hi a olmi a si lo a har mi a si.
(Duhhrilnak, Tuahnak, A tuah)
CHOOSE
Jesuh ih kan mahih bulpa a langmi cangvaihnak hi thupi tuk ah a ret (A fimmi thuthluknak le Thulunnak)
Jesuh ih Nitin te kan nunnak ah tontehmi “a fimmi duh hrilnak in sim ih cumi cu, Thuawi nun hi a si”
Sung hi “Ralrinank a pek ih cumi cu, Duhhrilnak hi a si.
and Deu.
11: 26 - 29’ 28 sunh khal ah (Moses ih - Thlasuah le duhhrilnak ka lo pek khuimi sawn nan hril ding tiin Bawipa in a ti).
Deu.
30: 19-20; ) - Nunnak hril uh cuti cun nan fate an nung ding ih Pathian kha thinlung tak in nan biak thei ding.
Difference Verse 13 and 14 (New Idea)
V 13 (New Idea) - Khuimi si a tha sawn
V 14 (Nouns) narrow and Hard
; - Harsatnak le Aihramnak tuarnak Thuhla a sim
DOING
Pathian duhnak tuah in fial.
Pathian duhnak tuah thuhla a sim tik ah: Prophet, Zirh tu dik le dik lo tahthimnak khal ah - An nunnak in zoh uh a ti: (Deu 13: 1-11; 18: 20-22)
Tuahmi hman le tuahmi hman lo thu hla a sim ().
(A rah lomi)
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9