Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.09UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.13UNLIKELY
Joy
0.59LIKELY
Sadness
0.2UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.39UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.18UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.96LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.9LIKELY
Extraversion
0.08UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.62LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.81LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Review of 1 John ..... Two Traps 1.
The World (Be careful what you value) 2. False Teachers (Be careful who you listen to)
Be Aware of Antichrist
+Among Us, Not of Us (vv.
18-19)
+ Without the Holy Spirit (v.
20)
+False Teachers who Reject the Father and the Son.
(vv.
22-23)
The Bible Knowledge Commentary (B.
In Light of the World’s Allurements (2:15–17))
The writer was not dissatisfied with the spiritual state of his readers.
Much less did he question or doubt their salvation,... On the contrary, his readers may even be viewed as having matured in the faith.
John wrote precisely because their present state was so good.
But he wished to warn them about dangers which always exist, no matter how far one has advanced in his Christian walk.
Review verses 15-17
Moves from the dangers of loving the world to following false worldly teachers who were of the world.
Gnosticism
Gnosticism: a second-century heretical Christian movement that taught that the material world was created and maintained by a lesser divine being, that matter and the physical body are inherently evil, and that salvation can be obtained only through an esoteric knowledge of divine reality and the self-denial of physical pleasures.
Myers, Jeff.
Understanding the Faith: A Survey of Christian Apologetics (Understanding the Times) (p.
107).
David C Cook.
Kindle Edition.
Gnosticism taught that the world was made by a lesser divine being and that the material world and body were intrinsically evil.
Because Jesus’s appearing in a body would have corrupted his ministry, gnostics believed that Jesus was merely a spirit who appeared to be human.
Gnostics taught that our main problem is ignorance, not sin, and that it is possible to gain “special knowledge” leading to salvation for those clever enough to decode it.
Myers, Jeff.
Understanding the Faith: A Survey of Christian Apologetics (Understanding the Times) (p.
108).
David C Cook.
Kindle Edition.
Read verse 18
This verse indicates they are Among Us, but not of us.
v. 18 The antichrist comes during the last hour.
- (From the time of Jesus death to the return of Christ.)
The readers knew about the predicted advent of the Antichrist and needed to be alerted to the appearance of many who would display his traits of hostility toward God’s Christ.
This is a clear indication that history has entered a climactic era: the last hour.
Hebrews 1:2 “but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world.”
2 peter 3:3 “knowing this first of all, that scoffers will come in the last days with scoffing, following their own sinful desires.”
Jude 1:18 “They said to you, “In the last time there will be scoffers, following their own ungodly passions.””
v. 18 There are many of them.
v. 18 They are here now.
Read verse 19
The evidence of their not being “of us” is that they did not remain but went out.
What does is mean they went out?
v. 19 “They went out from us” and “Not really of us”-
“Us” contrasts with the “you” in 2:20–21, which referred to the readers.
It does not make sense that the false teachers had left the churches to which the readers belonged.
If they had, how were they still a problem?
On the other hand if, like the legalists of Acts 15, they had seceded from the apostolic churches of Jerusalem and Judea, then they were a particular threat to the readers because they came to them claiming roots in the soil out of which Christianity arose.
Thus John was eager to deny any connection with them.
Walvoord, J. F., & Zuck, R. B., Dallas Theological Seminary.
(1985).
The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures (Vol.
2, p. 891).
Victor Books.
v. 19 “for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us; but they went out, so that it would be shown that they all are not of us.
” -
This leaving demonstrated their disharmony within the apostolic circles.
People don’t tend to separate from churches or groups they are in agreement with.
John language here seems to be indicating that this is not a separation a difference of personal preferences, but rather a doctrinal separation.
The writer’s point was that these men did not really share the spirit and perspective of the apostolic circle, for if they had their secession would not have taken place.
Christian’s hope of protection against the antichrist/false teachers.
Read v. 20
v. 20 They don’t have the anointing from the Holy One.
They are Without the Holy Spirit
It would seem that the anointing the believers have from the Holy One is the Holy Spirit.
(Refer to verse 27) Here in this verse the “anointing” is seen as a person given to us by Christ....[Pause] Prior to Christ death, Jesus promised his disciples said he would send the helper.
This we understand to be the Holy Spirit.
We today still have this same hope.
Once we have received Jesus Christ is our personal savior, we have the Holy Spirit.
The Holy Spirit then becomes the protection that we have against false teachers.
One of the ministries that we see that the Holy Spirit has in the life of the believer is that he continues to teach the believers truth.
We know that the Holy Spirit aids the believer in his understanding of truth when they spend time studying and meditating on the word of God, which is truth.
Read vv.
21-22
The are are False Teachers who Reject the Father and the Son
vv.
21-22 They do not speak the truth concerning Jesus Christ.
This then really become that which defines the antichrist.
They deny the Son.
They lie concerning the Son.
They deny that Jesus is the Christ.
(Messiah, the chosen one of God.)
Read vv.
22-23
vv.
22-23 They do not have the Father nor the Son.
They deny the Father and the Son.
It is impossible to say that they have the Father while denying the son.
If you deny the son you deny the Father.
Don’t live in willful ignorance of their existence and the danger they cause.
Teach others of their existence and let them know they potential danger they can cause.
Beware of Antichrist
(Damage they cause)
vv.
21-22 They do not know the truth, yet they promote their teachings as truth.
They use lies/deception to promote a false truth.
Possibly they do it in ignorance and/or they may do it for personal gain.
What they say may sound very good.
It may fit into our cultural understanding of the the world around us.
It may even be a positive message.
But, if is is not rooted in God’s world and in the person of Jesus Christ, it is empty and without depth.
I does not promote the eternal.
Such teaching may get us to put our hopes in the world things.
It may get us to focus on the things of this world, rather than the things eternal.
While we are in this world we ought to be good stewards of how we live.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9