Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.63LIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.83LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.43UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.94LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.64LIKELY
Extraversion
0.26UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.66LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.45UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
I hardly need to introduce our passage by now, right?
And yet this love that Paul speaks of is so foreign to the human heart, that we still have an age to learn all the truths revealed here.
So let’s read it again, and let’s try to hear it with fresh ears, all over again—ponder each verb, every noun, all of the adjectives, adverbs and prepositions.
Bible
Our verse
The verse we are focusing on today is verse 6:
Video
Before we dig into the passage, I want to play a short clip that shows how our culture understand love and loving someone.
Let’s watch this motivational clip on How to Love People for Who they are:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvzGZCCq8hk
Question:
What does this clip assume about the human struggle, and how is that different from the Christian perspective?
God’s love
Perhaps the biggest difference between God’s love and our culture’s view of love is due to the difference in understanding of the human condition, the human struggle, the human problem.
The world claims that human beings are inherently good creatures who suffer from merely from ignorance or injury.
Buddhism, for example, claims that all we need is enlightenment—rescue from ignorance.
The doctrine of social justice, what is now called “wokeness” tells us that we need to be healed from the injury that a corrupt system has inflicted on us.
And so on.
Christianity makes a different claim:
You can see that Christianity does recognise ignorance as a problem, but it is a self-inflicted problem.
Injury (here “becoming worthless”) is also a problem, but again, it is self-inflicted.
Every human being has chosen to turn away from God and has thus brought all these problems on themselves.
Christianity therefore insists that there is a necessary step before any healing can take place: to turn back to God.
This repentance is motivated by a realisation that we are indeed, abject failures, but were created to be God’s children.
How to show God’s love
Question:
Thinking back on the clip we watched, what did it say about how we are to love someone?
OK, now let’s look at our passage:
Let’s just get these words clarified, because that’s important.
Part 1: Not rejoice in wrongdoing
The word that the NIV translates as “delight” most often means rejoice.
The picture the word paints is of someone who received genuine joy over something.
Remember Jesus’ explanation for the parable of the lost sheep?
That rejoicing that happens in heaven is what we’re talking about here.
Except, of course, that love does not do that with our next word, evil, wrongdoing or unrighteousness.
This word refers to the type of wrongdoing that is breaking some rule.
Sometimes the New Testament uses it to refer to breaking God’s rule, which is when it is translated as unrighteous.
But much of the time it is referring to breaking the general moral code that all human beings have written on their hearts.
In chapter 5 of this letter to the Corinthians, Paul has chastised them for tolerating a type of sexual immorality that even the pagans don’t tolerate, incest.
So when Paul is talking about wrongdoing here, he’s talking about a wide range of sins.
But what does it mean that love does not rejoice in wrongdoing?
Anthony Thiselton suggests that this goes beyond merely regarding the sin as wrong, but rather:
If we genuinely love a person, we should not take pleasure at conduct which gives us the opportunity to lecture them or to rebuke them about their wrongdoing.
Here, again, may be an allusion to overly ready pleasure in prophetic rebuke and pronouncing judgment on failures within the congregation.
Does such a prophet or preacher genuinely love those whose welfare he or she claims to cherish if this gives pleasure?
God’s love takes joy in neither the wrongdoing, nor in the naturally hurtful consequences.
Reflection:
How often have you taken comfort, or even joy, in the idea that a tormenter will eventually receive their comeuppance?
Part 2: Rejoice with truth
Now, for the first time in his description, Paul provides an opposite, or a counter to one of his descriptors.
He says that love does not rejoice in wrongdoing, but rather rejoices with the truth.
You might have noticed that love rejoices with the truth, not in it.
There are two ways to understand this, rejoicing with something is simply joining in with it in your rejoicing.
But it’s hard to understand what that means, when the thing you are joining in with is truth.
A second meaning, is that in rejoicing with something you are actually multiplying the rejoicing, so it indicates an even greater rejoicing.
But what is it that love is pouring out this rejoicing over?
The word “truth” is very common in the NT, and has quite a broad range of meanings, although since the range of meanings maps almost directly onto the English word “truth” it doesn’t need to be translated into other words much.
For example, does it mean this?
What does that mean, anyway?
That’s a good topic for another sermon.
Or does it mean this?
This comes from chapter 5 of this letter, where Paul is, remember, criticising the Corinthian church for celebrating, even boasting about, sexual immorality.
Here truth seems to have a broader meaning, and refers to the real nature of the universe.
The universe is made in such a way that some things are simply morally wrong—morality is a part of the fabric of the universe, just as much as atoms and energy are.
This is completely at odds with our post-modern culture, which sees so-called “truth” as a weapon wielded to gain power over others.
We cherry-pick evidence to suit our own perspective.
We indulge in the fallen human error called “confirmation bias,” which makes us inclined to only listen to those who agree with us.
We choose our words so that they carry imply something quite different from the actual truth—for example we’ll call someone we disagree with stubborn or pig-headed, but someone we agree with persistent or strong-minded.
Love doesn’t rejoice in this.
Love is absolutely delighted when all this is swept away, and people focus on the truth that we all share—the reality that we all live in.
The world that we all dwell in.
The God who created and sustains each one of us.
Love goes wild when people share in that truth.
When they care more about understanding both their own weaknesses as well as their strengths.
When they put as much effort into truly understanding others as themselves, not just making excuses, but really understanding.
That’s love!
And that’s hard, because in a world where “truth” is weaponised, we are saying, “No, I refuse to use truth as a weapon, because it is too precious.”
Reflection:
What is an area in your life that you would love to be able to share with others, warts and all, and be able to rejoice with them, rather than be afraid that they would use your weaknesses against you?
Let’s pray:
Lord, please help us to not rejoice in wrongdoing, especially when it seems that an annoying person will be caught and punished in their wrongdoing.
Instead help us to talk the greatest delight in really seeing clearly, in knowing what is true, not just what is convenient or comforting to us.
In Jesus name,
Amen.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9